ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Evaluating and enhancing the service capacity of secondary public hospitals in urban China: a multi-method empirical analysis based on Guangzhou (2019-2023).
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Supply-demand governance of hierarchical healthcare systems: mobile big data unveils non-random patient flow patterns and the bypass premium in cities.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Secondary public hospitals play a pivotal role in China's hierarchical medical system, serving as a critical intermediary tier. However, in rapidly urbanizing cities such as Guangzhou, these hospitals face mounting challenges including widening efficiency disparities, imbalanced resource allocation, and weak governance structures. This study aims to systematically evaluate the evolution and spatial dynamics of service capacity among secondary general public hospitals in Guangzhou, offering empirical evidence to support capacity improvement and policy optimization. Methods: A composite evaluation framework was constructed across three dimensions: medical quality, operational efficiency, and sustainability. Based on panel data from 12 secondary general public hospitals in Guangzhou between 2019 and 2023, we applied a combination of Entropy-TOPSIS model, Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), and the Dagum Gini Coefficient to assess overall service capacity levels, temporal trends, and spatial inequalities. Results: The findings indicate a general upward trend in service capacity; however, disparities among hospitals have intensified. While indicators of medical safety (e.g., mortality and complication rates) have steadily improved, there remains significant divergence in surgical ratios and pharmaceutical service coverage-particularly in peripheral areas. KDE analysis reveals a transition from unimodal to bimodal distribution, indicating stratification of service capacity. Decomposition of the Dagum Gini Coefficient shows that transvariation (inter-group overlaps) is the main source of inequality, underscoring increasing cross-regional capacity divergence. Conclusions: Although Guangzhou's secondary public hospitals have shown overall improvement, challenges remain in terms of regional coordination and internal structural disparities. This study recommends differentiated interventions such as specialty alliances, performance-based resource allocation, and workforce optimization to enhance system resilience and equity. The proposed evaluation model demonstrates strong applicability and scalability, offering theoretical and empirical insights for healthcare system governance in other rapidly urbanizing regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.