ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Effect of modified mobilization with movement and motor learning on volleyball females players with shoulder impingement syndrome.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common issue among athletes, especially volleyball players, leading to pain and limited function. To evaluate effectiveness of combining modified mobilization with movement (MWM) and motor learning principles with traditional physical therapy for treating shoulder impingement syndrome. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis randomized controlled trial was conducted at Pharos University Alexandria from May to November 2021 with 30 female volleyball players (aged 20-35 years) experiencing unilateral SIS. Eligibility required a history of shoulder pain over one week, limited range of motion with proximal anterolateral shoulder pain, a medical SIS diagnosis, and two positive impingement tests (Neer, Hawkins-Kennedy, or Jobe's). Exclusion criteria included fibromyalgia, shoulder fractures, dislocations, subluxations, tendon ruptures, prior surgery, trauma-induced pain, numbness, recent corticosteroid injections, ligamentous laxity, and systemic illnesses. Participants were randomized into Group A (traditional therapy) and Group B (therapy with MWM and motor learning). Each group received nine treatment sessions over three weeks (three per week). Pain was measured with the visual analog scale (VAS), and shoulder flexion and abduction range of motion (ROM) were assessed using a goniometer at baseline and after the 9
resultsThe mean age of participants was 31.63 ± 3.91 years. Both groups showed significant improvements in pain and ROM, but Group B demonstrated superior results, with VAS scores decreasing from 6.00 to 0.93 and significant increases in flexion (56.86°) and abduction (58.13°) with (
conclusionThe combined approach of mobilization with movement (MWM) and motor learning with traditional therapy significantly enhanced pain and ROM recovery in athletes with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.