ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Investigating creativity and learning style preferences in anesthesia students.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding anesthesia students' creativity and learning styles can significantly enhance educational strategies and professional development within medical sciences. This study aimed to identify the predominant learning styles and creativity levels among anesthesia students at Iran University of Medical Sciences. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Iran University of Medical Sciences, including all anesthesia students of the academic year 2024. A total of 120 students were selected through the census method, and 110 completed questionnaires were analyzed. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory (KLSI V) and Abedi's Creativity Questionnaire were used to assess learning styles and creativity levels, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and t-tests to determine the significance of differences in creativity scores among different learning styles and academic semesters. The study revealed diverse learning styles among students, with converging (37.2%) being the most prevalent, followed by accommodating (30%), assimilating (20%), and diverging (12.7%). Significant differences were found in creativity scores among different learning styles, with converging style students exhibiting higher creativity scores. In addition, younger students showed higher creativity levels and creativity scores tended to decrease as students progressed through academic semesters. Second-semester students demonstrated superior creativity compared to those in later semesters. Identifying learning styles and fostering creativity among anesthesia students is crucial for tailoring educational strategies and enhancing professional development. Recognizing and nurturing creativity can lead to better preparedness in the field, adaptability to challenges, and innovation in patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.