Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575486›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Harnessing the microbiome to improve clinical outcomes for cancer, transplant, and immunocompromised patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Lizbeth Nieves, Alexandra Roach, Joseph Hunter, Sarah Smeh, Andrew Islas, Ariana Islas, Joseph Blattman, Michelle Di Palma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lizbeth NievesSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Alexandra RoachDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Joseph HunterSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Sarah SmehSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Andrew IslasSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Ariana IslasSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Joseph BlattmanSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Michelle Di PalmaSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been a growing emphasis on understanding how the architecture of the human microbiome can impact typical biological processes and patient clinical outcomes. In fact, microbiome modifications and modulations have not only been associated with impacts on general health and well-being but have also been shown to yield differences in patient responsiveness to vaccines, medications, and chemotherapeutic regimens. Much of this influence likely stems from how changes in the microbiome result in differences in microbial communities and the subsequent release of microbial-derived metabolites that can alter typical immunological processes. Understanding how microbial composition can impact patient responsiveness can be particularly important in the intensive care unit (ICU), where the efficacy of medications and treatments can result in negative patient outcomes if unsuccessful. Clinical scientists have further developed the concept of the pathobiome, a disease-promoting microbiome whose development can be associated with dysbiosis. Understanding how the microbiome and its associated components can impact patient responsiveness, especially in the ICU, must be further researched and understood. Here, we analyze what causes variances in the microbiome and pathobiome in significant immunocompromised populations, including cancer patients and transplant recipients, and how variances in the microbiome can impact patient outcomes in the ICU. Further, we detail potential future applications of how our understanding of what impacts the human microbiome during the treatment of these populations may be exploited to improve patient prognosis.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostIntensive Care UnitsMicrobiotaNeoplasmsTransplant RecipientsDysbiosisHumansTreatment OutcomecancerdysbiosisICUimmunocompromisedintensive care unitmicrobiomepathobiometransplant

Identifiers

PMID40575486
PMCPMC12198133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.