Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575466›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2025

What is Family and Group Conferencing for adults? Part 1: Characterising the model and methods of enquiry.

Sharanya Mahesh, Jerry Tew, Mary Mitchell, Kar-Man Au, Vicky Nicholls, Abyd Quinn Aziz, Miranda Johnson, T K Vincent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sharanya MaheshUniversity of Birmingham School of Social Policy, Birmingham, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0892-1990
Jerry TewUniversity of Birmingham School of Social Policy, Birmingham, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4486-8333
Mary MitchellSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6594-9194
Kar-Man AuCardiff University School of Social Sciences, Cardiff, Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1889-3172
Vicky NichollsIndependent lived experience researcher, London, UK.
Abyd Quinn AzizCardiff University School of Social Sciences, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Miranda JohnsonRoyal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea / Westminster City Council, London, UK.
T K VincentFulcrum Family Services, Bromley, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9010-9065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Family and Group Conferencing (FGC) is a relatively new strengths-based approach applied to adults needing social care and mental health support in the UK. Although the approach is well established in children's services in the UK, few services currently offer FGCs to adults; therefore, there is limited evidence regarding FGCs in the adult services context in the UK. This study aims to fill this gap by examining how FGCs work and what differences they can make in people's lives. Methods: This paper (Part 1) addresses the first of two related research questions, aiming to characterize the practice model(s) that pertain to the context of adults' FGCs as currently offered. We employed a mixed methods research design drawing on data from both, previous literature as well as current practice by undertaking a comprehensive literature review, national survey and stakeholder interviews with current services and a deliberative forum involving a range of stakeholders pertaining to adult FGCs. Results: Although there is some variation in the practice model(s) offered by services, the overall approach is underpinned by a relatively consistent set of values and principles, although these are often implicit. The FGC offers a staged approach that enables people and their networks to take greater control over their support arrangements. It is seen as an appropriate service offer across all adults and mental health services with the potential to result in a range of positive outcomes (as will be discussed in Part 2). Conclusion: Central to achieving this is flexibility within the service offer to accommodate the social and cultural needs of the individual and their network, the independence of the FGC coordinator, the necessity of sufficient preparation for all participants, and rapport building in advance of the Conference.

Indexed as

adult social careFamily Group Conferencingmental healthperson-centred caresocial workstrengths-based practice

Identifiers

PMID40575466
PMCPMC12198747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.