Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575451›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR2025

Effects of respiratory physiotherapeutic interventions on pulmonary mechanics, vital parameters and pain in newborns: A systematic review.

Adriele de Morais Nunes, Ana Tereza Nascimento Sales Figueiredo Fernandes, Adyna Tévina de Castro Silva, Ingrid Guerra Azevedo, Karolinne Souza Monteiro, Silvana Alves Pereira

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Respiratory Physiotherapy Techniques in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adriele de Morais NunesPrograma de Pós-graduação em Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte.
Ana Tereza Nascimento Sales Figueiredo FernandesFisioterapia Universidade Estadual da Paraíba.
Adyna Tévina de Castro SilvaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte.
Ingrid Guerra AzevedoFisioterapia Temuco Catholic University.
Karolinne Souza MonteiroPrograma de Pós Graduação em Fisioterapia, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte.
Silvana Alves PereiraPrograma de Pós-graduação em Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of conventional and non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy on pulmonary mechanics, vital parameters, and pain in newborns admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. Methods and Analyses: Databases including PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched. Randomized clinical trials comparing conventional and non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy in newborns (1 hour to 28 days) in neonatal intensive care units were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed bias using the PEDro scale. Data were presented as mean, standard deviation, median, and quartiles. Meta-analysis was not feasible due to incomplete post-intervention data. Results: Out of 5,653 articles found, four were included. Two studies reported major increases in peripheral oxygen saturation after both respiratory physiotherapy techniques, a third showed decreased respiratory rate, and a fourth showed increased heart rate. Neither conventional nor non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy was suggested to cause pain in participants. No study evaluated lung mechanics parameters. The methodological quality of the included studies was predominantly moderate. Only one study exhibited low methodological quality. Conclusion: Both conventional and non-conventional respiratory physiotherapy techniques showed no adverse effects on vital signs or pain in NICU newborns. Further clinical trials are encouraged to assess lung function more comprehensively. Future studies should include short- and long-term evaluations of lung mechanics, respiratory distress, and pain.

Indexed as

NewbornPhysiotherapyRespiratory mechanicsvital signs

Identifiers

PMID40575451
PMCPMC12199995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.