ArticleAsian biomedicine : research, reviews and news2025
The novel risk score model for predicting the poor anticoagulation control in patients with atrial fibrillation taking warfarin.
Article in Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk scores to guide the use of anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous trials have shown that the C-statistics of SAMe-TT Objectives: To propose the novel risk score model for predicting the poor anticoagulation control in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients compared with the SAMe-TT Methods: We prospectively recruited AF patients from 27 hospitals between 2014 and 2017 in the COOL AF Thailand registry. The poor anticoagulation control was defined as TTR <65%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed for the prediction of poor anticoagulation control. The novel risk score model was then generated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the C-statistics and to compare between the novel risk score model and the SAMe-TT Results: Of 3,461 patients, 2,233 patients taking warfarin having available TTR data were retrieved. There were 1,432 patients having poor anticoagulation control (TTR < 65%) and 801 patients having good anticoagulation control (TTR ≥ 65%). Symptomatic AF, diabetes, heart failure, and a history of bleeding were associated with increased risk while obesity, AF duration, and paroxysmal AF were associated with decreased risk of poor anticoagulation control. SHOB-D Conclusions: SHOB-D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.