ArticleJACS Au2025
Identifying Key Factors Influencing Advanced Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalysts.
Article in JACS Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data-driven approaches are increasingly vital in the field of catalyst design, significantly accelerating catalyst development. However, the mechanisms and rules underlying these approaches often lack transparency, potentially leading to unreliable outcomes due to an insufficient understanding of the specific processes involved. Here, we developed a method that combines analytical learning with constrained data mining techniques to not only identify high-performance materials but also elucidate the optimization pathways for enhancing their performance. Using this method, we screened over a thousand potential catalysts, identifying top-performing single-atom catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction and mapping out optimization pathways to progressively improve performance. Notably, our findings suggest that decisions aimed at enhancing material performance, when based on tuning key factors identified from entire data sets, can be misleading. Instead, a more effective strategy is to make decisions through a systematic, step-by-step analysis of subgroup data sets, specifically focusing on subsets of high-performance materials that exhibit common characteristics. This approach enhances both the development of knowledge from data and the trustworthiness of the results, offering new insights for advancing data-driven approaches in the rational design of material properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.