ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Methylation and gene expression patterns in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma highlight a panel of genes associated with disease progression-free survival.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methylation and gene expression patterns in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma highlight a panel of genes associated with disease progression-free survival.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Over the past decade, advancements in next-generation sequencing have significantly enhanced our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (ACP). Objective: This study integrated methylome and transcriptome analyses in ACP samples to explore the potential interplay between DNA methylation and RNA expression signatures for diagnostic and prognostic applications in ACP patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated clinicopathological features, DNA methylation, and gene expression profiles in 15 patients with ACP (33% women, age range: 3-55 years, 53% diagnosed before 18 years) treated at Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo. Results: Multidimensional scaling and principal component analysis identified two distinct clusters (ACP-A: n=9, ACP-B: n=6) with consistent composition across DNA methylation and gene expression profiles. While most clinical and histopathological characteristics were similar between clusters, ACP-A exhibited a longer median progression-free survival. ACP-B showed a higher prevalence of hypomethylated probes in CGI sites, and 63% of differentially methylated positions (DMPs) located in gene body regions. Differential methylation patterns were categorized into Methyl-Set1 (hypomethylated in ACP-A and hypermethylated in ACP-B) and Methyl-Set2 (hypermethylated in ACP-A and hypomethylated in ACP-B). Clustering analyses based on the methylation levels of probes and expression levels of the stringently filtered 212- and 37-gene sets further confirmed these two distinct ACP subgroups. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted key roles in synaptic modulation, nervous system development, cell adhesion, as well as pathways linked to RAS signaling, GTPase activity, and membrane potential regulation. Conclusion: Although clinical characteristics were largely comparable between the clusters, ACP-B patients exhibited shorter median progression-free survival, suggesting a more aggressive phenotype. The higher prevalence of hypomethylation in ACP-B indicates increased transcriptional activation, potentially driving tumor aggressiveness. The strong concordance between methylation and transcriptomic data in the 212- and 37-gene sets underscores their potential as a clinically relevant molecular biomarker panel. These gene sets demonstrate robustness in distinguishing ACP clusters, making it a promising tool for clinical sample classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.