ArticleJournal of patient experience2025
A Further Exploration of the Elements of ICU Patient Experience in the Chinese Context: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in sedation management and early rehabilitation have enabled intensive care unit (ICU) patients to recall and form their own care experiences. However, existing patient-reported experience measures often draw from general inpatient populations, lacking specificity to the ICU context. This study aimed to explore the key elements, in order to help shape the framework of ICU patients' experience. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 18 patients from 4 ICUs at Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, China. Semistructured interviews were carried out within 1 week of ICU discharge between January and February 2024. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis following the COREQ checklist. The analysis identified 5 functional domains encompassing 8 themes: organizational (Rapid Response, ICU-managed Transfer), informational (Information Provision), relational (Caring Respect), clinical (Professionalism in Healthcare), and logistical (ICU Environment, Physical Comfort, Family Visitation). These domains and themes were derived from participants' narratives, revealing how ICU patients perceived and made sense of their care experiences. The study provides a patient-centered perspective on critical care experience, contributing to the conceptual framework of ICU patient experience. Findings underscore the importance of addressing both clinical and nonclinical aspects of care. Further research is needed to translate these experiential elements into a structured patient-reported experience measure tailored for ICU populations, ultimately supporting more responsive and compassionate critical care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.