ArticleCureus2025
Knowledge and Practice of Eyelid Hygiene Among the General Population in Al-Qunfudah Governorate, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIt is believed that ocular surface diseases (OSDs) represent a public health issue. Common disorders include blepharitis, dry eyes, and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Eyelid cleanliness remains essential for preserving eyelid health and relieving ocular symptoms.
objectivesThis study aims to assess the knowledge and practice of eyelid hygiene and its associated factors among the general population in Al-Qunfudah governorate, Saudi Arabia.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 273 adults who are above 18 years of age and live in Al-Qunfudah. The data collection tool was a validated self-administered online questionnaire, which was preceded by consent and insurance to maintain the participant's confidentiality.
resultsA total of 273 eligible participants completed the study questionnaire with a mean age of 26.9 ± 9.2 years. Exactly 196 (71.8%) were females. About 253 (92.7%) wash their face after daily activities, 208 (76.2%) wash their eyelashes, 102 (37.4%) use a cleaning solution for eyelids, and 161 (59.0%) cleaned their eyelids during the past three days. A total of 199 (72.9%) had heard about dry eye disease. Only 51 (18.7%) heard about meibomian gland dysfunction. A total of 176 (98.8%) female participants reported using eye cosmetics; 69 (39.2%) used one type. The most reported cosmetic use-associated complications included eye redness 130 (47.7%), itching 118 (43.2%), dryness 62 (22.7%), and sand sensation 42 (15.3%), while 76 (27.8%) had no effect on the eye due to the cosmetic use. Retired, those who had high incomes, and those who did not use a cleaning solution for eyelids were more aware of dry eye disease than other participants, with p-values of 0.045, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively. Those who used to wash their eyelashes knew more about meibomian gland dysfunction than those who did not (p=0.001).
conclusionThe general population of Al-Qunfudah was well-informed about dry eye disease, the usage of eye cosmetics, and their effects on the eyes, and they had good habits of washing their faces and eyelids. On the other hand, one detrimental behavior associated with a lack of understanding of meibomian gland dysfunction is sharing cosmetic tools with other people. Lastly, patients should learn about MGD, dry eyes, and basic eyelid hygiene from ophthalmologists and primary care doctors, with a focus on low-income people. Regarding the everyday eyelid hygiene procedures that the general public is advised to follow, more research is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.