ArticleCureus2025
Predicting Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Children Undergoing Elective Surgeries Under General Anesthesia Using COLDS Score: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims Pediatric patients undergoing surgeries under general anesthesia (GA) who have a recent upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) pose a unique challenge for the anesthesiologists. We aimed to utilize the COLDS score as a pre-anesthetic risk assessment tool to predict the likelihood of perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs) in children with URTI. Methods and materials After ethical approval, we prospectively collected data over six months from children undergoing various ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeries under GA. Children above one year undergoing elective ENT surgeries were included. Children less than one year, non-ENT surgical pediatric patients, and those undergoing emergency surgeries were excluded. Results A total of 270 patients were included in the analysis, among whom 25 (9.3%) experienced postoperative events. The COLDS score was able to effectively distinguish between patients who did and did not experience postoperative complications. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.99) suggests a strong discriminatory ability of the score. The specificity of the model was high at 97.96% (95% CI: 95.9-99.6), suggesting a strong ability to correctly identify patients without events. The sensitivity was lower at 40.0% (95% CI: 20.7-60.0), i.e., only 40% of patients who experienced complications were detected by the score. Conclusions COLDS score can help in distinguishing patients who will and will not have PRAEs. But as the sensitivity is moderate, we recommend using the COLDS score along with a detailed clinical assessment based on the type of surgery planned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.