ReviewCureus2025
Intraoperative Visual Field Assessment in Parietal Glioma Resection and the Role of Virtual Reality Headset-Based Mapping.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this literature review is to summarize techniques used to prevent postoperative visual pathway complications during parietal glioma resection involving optic radiations, focusing on the use of virtual reality (VR) headsets during awake patient surgery. We searched the Medline database for literature between the years 1970 and 2024. Only results that included the use of awake craniotomy for sensory mapping were included for evaluation. The search was limited to studies published in English and humans as subjects. Only studies that reported patient groups treated with either parietal glioma surgery under general anesthesia or awake conditions were included. Articles describing deep brain stimulation as the therapy were excluded because the primary focus of this literature review is on techniques such as VR and intraoperative mapping, which aim to preserve or protect the integrity of the visual pathways during glioma resection involving the optic radiations. The variables initially selected for analysis included the length of surgery, length of hospital stay, extent of resection, cost, mortality, and neurological morbidity. Cost was later removed from the studied variables because too few studies reported it. No commentaries or reviews were included. Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors, located mainly in the cerebral cortex. Of them, some are found in the parietal lobe, which is a convergence area for multiple stimulus integrations. After surgical resection of this lobe, patients may develop postoperative verbal, linguistic, and visual field deficits. The gold standard treatment for these tumors is surgical resection. The main technique to preserve functional pathways is by intraoperative monitoring, for which different tools have been developed in the past years. Surgeons can test and preserve important tracts, such as the visual pathway. Intraoperative ultrasound has been shown to be an excellent, accessible, and affordable intraoperative monitoring tool. Magnetic resonance imaging-based tractography and VR-based brain mapping allow not only intraoperative monitoring, but also create a preoperative plan by demarcating the structures and margins of the tumor prior to and during surgery, increasing the success rate in maximum resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.