ArticleCureus2025
Current State of Pediatric Direct Primary Care: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Pediatricians.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Direct primary care (DPC) is an emerging healthcare model emphasizing patient-centered care, reduced administrative burden, and enhanced physician satisfaction. While DPC has gained traction among pediatricians, limited data exist on the distribution, characteristics, and satisfaction of pediatric DPC practices. This study aims to provide a national overview of pediatric DPC practices, describe physician demographics and motivations, and evaluate satisfaction among DPC physicians. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey of US-based pediatricians practicing in the DPC model to assess physician demographics, practice characteristics, and satisfaction. A 19-section survey was developed in consultation with pediatric DPC leaders and piloted within the Zest Pediatric Network. It was distributed on July 11, 2023, via the "Pediatricians Who Do DPC" Facebook group, practice websites, and direct outreach. Physicians were eligible if ≥75% of their panel was pediatric and their practice was operational. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and satisfaction between current and prior roles was compared using a two-tailed t-test (p < 0.05). Analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel. Results The analysis included 73 pediatric DPC physicians across 26 states. Most practices were single-doctor models (85%), located in suburban settings (73%), and managed small patient panels (<200 patients: 79%). Physicians reported high satisfaction; 94% were happier in DPC than in prior roles, citing reduced moral injury (89%) and improved work-life balance. While 73% of physicians earned less in DPC initially, 65% with practices ≥3 years old reported incomes similar to or greater than prior positions. Physicians cited meaningful patient relationships, greater autonomy, and improved work-life balance as key benefits. Key challenges included financial uncertainty, marketing burdens, and isolation. Conclusions Pediatric DPC offers significant benefits, including high physician satisfaction and reduced administrative burden, despite initial financial challenges. As practices mature, financial viability improves, suggesting long-term sustainability. Future research should evaluate patient outcomes, financial accessibility, and strategies to support new practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.