ArticleCureus2025
Correlation of Gastroduodenoscopic Findings With Histopathological Diagnosis of Gastroduodenal Biopsy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Endoscopic biopsies, which are performed for the diagnosis of gastric and duodenal lesions, are not pathognomonic and require histopathological confirmation. The aim of the present study was to determine the morphological spectrum of gastroduodenal lesions on histology and to find out the association between endoscopic and histopathological diagnosis. Methods This was a prospective observational study carried out at the department of pathology of a tertiary-care teaching hospital in northern India. Clinical details and endoscopic findings of all subjects were noted. The biopsies were obtained in 10% formalin and processed as per standard paraffin embedding techniques. Written informed consent from the participant and approval from the institutional ethics committee were obtained. SPSS software version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA) was used for the analysis of results. Pearson's chi-square tests and Fisher's exact two-tailed test were used to compare the category variables. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05. Results A total of 102 gastroduodenoscopic biopsies were assessed. Fifty-seven were gastric and 45 were duodenal biopsies. In gastric biopsies, out of 39 benign and eight malignant lesions diagnosed by endoscopy, 25 were confirmed by histopathology as benign and seven as malignant. In duodenal biopsies, out of 17 benign lesions and four malignant lesions diagnosed by endoscopy, 14 were confirmed by histopathology as benign and three as malignant. Conclusion Although we can rely on the gastroduodenoscopy to an acceptable extent in diagnosing malignant and benign lesions of the gastric and duodenal lesions, endoscopic observations alone are insufficient for definitive diagnosis of most of the lesions. The study suggests that all the findings of endoscopy should be combined with histopathological analysis to diagnose the gastric and duodenal lesions accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.