Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575194›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Primordial Follicle Response to Two Methods of Ovarian Cortex Retrieval and Vitrification: A Pilot Study.

Rebeca Chávez-Genaro, Gabriel Anesetti, Lorena Bonjour, Clara Fernández, Agustina Toledo, Karina Hernández, Natalibeth Barrera, Lidia Cantú, Dana Kimelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebeca Chávez-GenaroHistology and Embryology, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, URY.
Gabriel AnesettiHistology and Embryology, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, URY.
Lorena BonjourHistology and Embryology, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, URY.
Clara FernándezHistology and Embryology, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, URY.
Agustina ToledoHistology and Embryology, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, URY.
Karina HernándezHistology and Embryology, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, URY.
Natalibeth BarreraEmbryology, Centro de Esterilidad Montevideo, Montevideo, URY.
Lidia CantúEmbryology, Centro de Esterilidad Montevideo, Montevideo, URY.
Dana KimelmanGynecology, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Administración de los Servicios de Salud del Estado, Montevideo, URY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryopreservation and transplantation of ovarian cortical tissue are novel techniques to preserve fertility in young patients undergoing gonadotoxic treatments that may affect fertility. Vitrification has demonstrated growing success in restoring ovarian function and achieving pregnancy post-grafting. It helps maintain communication between follicles and interstitial tissue, which is essential for follicular growth. This study compares two ovarian cortex dissection techniques (strips and layers) using an ovine animal model. The results indicate that manipulation of the ovarian cortex affects primordial follicle activation and stromal tissue during vitrification, potentially compromising oocyte viability and reproductive potential. Additionally, the distribution of primordial follicles in ovarian tissue varies, influencing transplantation efficiency. Both dissection methods increase follicle activation, suggesting that mechanical manipulation impacts outcomes. These findings underscore the need to optimize tissue processing to enhance fertility preservation, particularly by understanding the roles of the stromal and extracellular matrix (ECM) in maintaining follicle dormancy and viability post-vitrification and reimplantation.

Indexed as

cryopreservationhistologyoncofertilityovaryprimordial follicles

Identifiers

PMID40575194
PMCPMC12202021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.