ArticleCureus2025
Outcomes of Prophylactic Central Neck Dissection in Clinically Node-Negative Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study From a Tertiary Care Centre.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinicopathological predictors of central lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), the most common form of differentiated thyroid cancer, generally has an excellent prognosis. However, locoregional recurrence, particularly in cervical lymph nodes, remains a clinical concern. It is debatable whether preventive central neck dissection (PCND) is beneficial for patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) PTC because it may reduce recurrence but increase surgical complications. Objective The study aims to evaluate the role of PCND in patients with cN0 PTC by assessing the incidence of occult central lymph node metastases, postoperative complication rates, and long-term outcomes, including recurrence and survival. Methods A tertiary care facility carried out a retrospective investigation on 188 patients who had cervical lymph nodes that were clinically and radiologically negative between 2016 and 2023. Two groups of patients were formed: Group A (n=86) received total thyroidectomy (TT) alone, and Group B (n=102) underwent TT with PCND. Clinical, pathological, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed, with a follow-up duration of eight years. Results Recurrence rates have been similar in both groups, with central compartment recurrence being the most frequent. Adjuvant treatment, including radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy, was commonly administered. Overall and disease-free survival (DFS) rates have been comparable, and PCND did not significantly impact complication rates, including permanent hypoparathyroidism and vocal cord paralysis (p=0.609 and p=0.452). Importantly, individuals with KRAS and BRAF gene mutations demonstrated a higher probability of metastasis, suggesting the potential benefit of PCND for these high-risk cases. Conclusion PCND in cN0 PTC is associated with a low complication rate when performed by an experienced surgeon and may help reduce recurrence in high-risk patients with KRAS and BRAF gene mutations. However, recent guidelines recommend that T1 and T2 stage tumors shouldn't routinely undergo PCND unless there are additional high-risk features. Findings emphasize the need for a selective approach to PCND, guided by tumor characteristics and molecular markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.