ArticleCureus2025
Association Between Initial Symptoms and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ranges from localized respiratory symptoms such as cough and sore throat to systemic symptoms such as fever and fatigue. To our knowledge, no study has assessed severe disease risk by dividing onset symptoms into localized respiratory and other symptoms. We aimed to determine whether the risk of severe COVID-19 differs depending on whether the symptoms at onset are limited to local respiratory symptoms.
methodThis was a multicenter prospective cohort study. The patients were classified into localized respiratory or systemic symptom groups based on the symptoms at onset. Demographic data, blood biomarkers, and clinical outcomes, including mortality, intubation, admission to the intensive care unit, and time to discharge, were compared. This study included 100 adult patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between July 2020 and August 2021.
resultTwelve patients were classified into the localized respiratory symptom group and the remaining 88 into the systemic symptom group. No significant differences between the groups were observed in the baseline characteristics, blood biomarkers, or clinical outcomes. The mortality rates were 0.0% and 4.6%, respectively. The median durations to discharge were 11 and 10 days, respectively (p=0.512). The levels of inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers, including interleukin-6 and hydroperoxides, were similar between the groups.
conclusionThe symptom type at disease onset was not significantly associated with differences in clinical outcomes. Comprehensive assessments beyond initial symptoms are crucial for predicting disease progression and optimizing management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.