Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575176›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Regional and patient-level determinants of endoscopic utilization in rural healthcare: a multi-level analysis.

Muye Ma, Pengfei Li, Zhengyang Lu, Nan Zhang, Suzhen Wang, Youhua Lu, Jinming Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muye MaSchool of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Pengfei LiSchool of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Zhengyang LuSchool of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Nan ZhangShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Science, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Suzhen WangSchool of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Youhua LuShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Science, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jinming YuShandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Science, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Despite numerous studies on endoscopic services in urban settings, tailored assessments in rural healthcare remain limited, creating a gap in our understanding of resource-constrained environments. To address this gap, this study innovatively applied the Andersen Behavioral Model to systematically quantify endoscopic examination uptake and identify both patient-level (e.g., occupation, health history) and region-level (e.g., infrastructural challenges, socioeconomic indicators) factors influencing service utilization in rural China. Methods: We employed a multi-level logistic regression model with random intercepts to account for intraregional correlation and fixed effects for individual predictors. A multi-stage stratified random sampling approach was employed across 6 prefectures, yielding a sample of 1118 patients. We initially used descriptive statistics to summarize basic sample characteristics. Univariate analysis was then conducted to identify potential factors associated with endoscopic examination utilization. To further quantify these associations, we applied single-level and multi-level logistic regression model to account for potential regional effects and provide more robust analysis. Results: Of the 1,118 surveyed patients, 62.3% underwent endoscopic examinations, and among these, 77.9% received services at county-level institutions. In single-level binary logistic regression, region, occupation, household size, history of gastritis/esophagitis, and lesion location emerged as significant predictors ( Conclusions: Our findings underscore the importance of addressing regional disparities through targeted resource allocation and localized health education programs to improve endoscopic service uptake among rural populations. These insights can inform policy interventions aimed at early cancer detection and optimized healthcare delivery in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

endoscopic examinationinfluencing factorsprecancerous lesionrural residentsupper digestive tract cancer

Identifiers

PMID40575176
PMCPMC12197858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.