ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Advancements in artificial intelligence for ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian pathophysiology and management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Pooled it
- Ensemble machine learning algorithms leveraged on serum proteomics for enhanced early detection of ovarian cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Approach for Classifying Benign, Malignant, and Borderline Ovarian Tumors Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Generative Adversarial Networks.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Early-fusion hybrid CNN-transformer models for multiclass ovarian tumor ultrasound classification.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer, as a common gynecological malignancy, is often found at an advanced stage clinically. Thus, improving the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer is crucial for the survival rate of patients. Ultrasound examination is the main method for ovarian cancer screening, but it is greatly influenced by the operator's experience and technique, increasing the risk of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Artificial intelligence uses computers to learn from input data and has already made significant progress in image recognition. Applying artificial intelligence to ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian cancer can enhance diagnostic accuracy, providing earlier treatment for patients. This article reviews the current application of artificial intelligence in the ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian cancer, in order to provide a reference for subsequent clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.