ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2025
Advancing ethical AI in healthcare through interpretability.
Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial intelligence and predictive tools in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a narrative review of current insights and advances.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Non-invasive prediction of invasive lung adenocarcinoma and high-risk histopathological characteristics in resectable early-stage adenocarcinoma by [18F]FDG PET/CT radiomics-based machine learning models: a prospective cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing Adoption of Large Language Models in Health Care: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interpretability is essential for building trust in health artificial intelligence (AI), but ensuring trustworthiness requires addressing broader ethical concerns, such as fairness, privacy, and reliability. This opinion article discusses the multilayered role of interpretability and transparency in addressing these concerns by highlighting their fundamental contribution to the responsible adoption and regulation of health AI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.