ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025
Contraceptive use and decision-making in Guéra, Chad: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chad has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios in the world, and low modern contraceptive prevalence. Understanding the barriers and influences on women's decision-making around contraceptive use is critical to reducing the unmet contraceptive need, and thus maternal mortality. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in three districts of Guéra province, Chad, including a longitudinal survey of women, focus group discussions with male and female users and non-users of modern contraceptives, and in-depth interviews with midwives, community health workers, and community leaders. Results: Survey participants showed increased knowledge of modern contraceptive methods, and 20.5% reported current modern contraceptive use at endline. Participants described multiple reasons for contraceptive non-use, including that it contradicts with their religious beliefs, community stigma and widespread misconceptions, particularly around long-acting reversible contraceptives. Husbands played a large role in a couple's contraceptive decision-making, as either a major facilitator or barrier depending on the individual. Discussion: Overall, the study's findings suggest that participant awareness of modern contraceptive methods increased. Contraceptive use was more than twice as high as the provincial rate. Given the dominance of injectables within our sample, programs should explore introducing and scaling up community-based distribution of the self-injectable contraceptive (DMPA-SC). The findings highlight the need for more diverse and tailored stigma reduction interventions in the community to promote awareness and reduce misconceptions of modern contraceptives among key groups of people, including men, couples, and religious and other community leaders. Values clarification and attitude training should be considered for all cadres of providers to promote non-discrimination and equity in contraceptive service provision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.