ArticleDrugs in context2025
Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a real-life study.
Article in Drugs in context, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that occurs more frequently in children but can also manifest in adults. Approximately 15-20% of children are affected worldwide. Persistent AD may be present in approximately 50% of patients during childhood. Despite the pivotal studies, there are not enough real-life studies using dupilumab, especially in Latin American countries. This study was performed in Brazil and is essential for evaluating this population. The objective of the study was to understand the real-life efficacy and safety of using dupilumab in patients with moderate or severe AD. Methods: Observational, descriptive study based on the biweekly evaluation of 100 patients using the immunobiological dupilumab in an infusion clinic for 16 consecutive weeks. Data collection was conducted from June 2020 to March 2022. To evaluate each sequential SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) value, a repeated measures analysis of variance was performed, with a value of Results: There was a significant decrease in SCORAD values from the second week of treatment. In 16 weeks, 80% of patients achieved SCORAD-50 and 37% achieved SCORAD-75. Regarding adverse effects, 22% of patients had conjunctivitis, 11% had facial erythema, 1% had herpes simplex and 1% had hypochromia at the application site. Regarding efficacy, the results showed a reduction in SCORAD value by 67.4% in 16 weeks, 72% of patients achieved SCORAD <25, that is, mild atopic dermatitis. Conclusion: This study identified that dupilumab was effective in real life, even outside of the controlled environments of pivotal studies. Additionally, despite conjunctivitis being a common adverse event, no patient required treatment discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.