ArticleBMJ public health2025
Conceptualisation of health among young people: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractIntroduction: Self-reported health is a widely used measure of general health in survey research. Qualitative studies that investigate young people's conceptualisation of health are hard to locate and use different measures of health and sample construction. This review aims to synthesise the findings of qualitative studies that investigate how young people conceptualise their health, including during self-assessments. Methods: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (APA PsycNet), ProQuest Sociology Collection (Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts/Sociological Abstracts/Sociology Database) and Web of Science Core Collection without date restrictions. Searches were last updated on 11 March 2025. We searched the reference lists of relevant studies and conducted backward and forward citation searching. Papers reporting qualitative primary studies that focused on the conceptualisation of health among 10-24-year olds were included. We used the Quality Framework for quality appraisal and the thematic synthesis strategy for data synthesis. Results: Twenty-one studies from 11 countries with a pooled sample of 1434 participants met the inclusion criteria. We developed two analytical themes: (1) 'dimensions of health' and (2) 'health in context' with eight subthemes. Factors from the physical dimension of health, such as symptoms, physical activity or diet, dominate in young people's conceptualisation of health; these factors are also considered when responding to self-assessed general health questions in the surveys. When the survey question uses the word 'feel', respondents discuss elements from physical, social and mental dimensions, and their interaction in the formation of health. In some studies, young people describe health in relation to context. Conclusions: This is the first systematic review of the conceptualisation of health among young people. Our findings indicate that self-reported general health questions in the surveys invite young people to focus on the physical aspects of health. Overall, young people hold a holistic conceptualisation of health. To improve the understanding of young people's health, future research needs to focus on conceptual clarity. Different wording captures different aspects of health that need to be balanced for optimal development of young people's health. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022367519.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.