ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2025
Evaluation of mid- and long-term outcomes following carotid endarterectomy with a double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique.
Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to evaluate the mid- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy with double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique. Methods: Between January 2011 and January 2021, a total of 94 patients (58 males, 36 females; mean age: 66.5±8.5 years; range, 40 to 82 years) who underwent carotid endarterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography were utilized during follow-up. Stenoses of 50% and above were defined as restenosis. Results: The mean carotid clamp time was 11.72±2.30 and the mean follow-up was 54.18±27.71 months. Two patients (2.1%) underwent revision due to bleeding and hematoma. No new cerebrovascular events were observed in the postoperative period (<30 days). During the follow-up, six (6.4%) patients with ≥50% stenosis on the same side and 14 (14.9%) patients with stenosis on the opposite side were identified. Primary patency rates were found to be 99% at one year, 95.4% at three years, 90% at five years, 71% at seven years, and 71% at nine years. Age was the only independent risk factor affecting survival. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that this technique can be used safely in patients with appropriate internal carotid artery diameter with favorable mid- and long-term patency rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.