Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575058›Full record

ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2025

Evaluation of mid- and long-term outcomes following carotid endarterectomy with a double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique.

Hüseyin Ali Tünel, İzzet Hafez, Adem İlkay Diken, Muhammed Onur Hanedan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hüseyin Ali TünelDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Başkent University Adana Medical and Research Center, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1175-1961
İzzet HafezDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Başkent University Adana Medical and Research Center, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8521-1389
Adem İlkay DikenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Başkent University Adana Medical and Research Center, Adana, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8782-7603
Muhammed Onur HanedanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ahi Evren Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8363-7861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the mid- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy with double-layer primary arteriotomy closure technique. Methods: Between January 2011 and January 2021, a total of 94 patients (58 males, 36 females; mean age: 66.5±8.5 years; range, 40 to 82 years) who underwent carotid endarterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography were utilized during follow-up. Stenoses of 50% and above were defined as restenosis. Results: The mean carotid clamp time was 11.72±2.30 and the mean follow-up was 54.18±27.71 months. Two patients (2.1%) underwent revision due to bleeding and hematoma. No new cerebrovascular events were observed in the postoperative period (<30 days). During the follow-up, six (6.4%) patients with ≥50% stenosis on the same side and 14 (14.9%) patients with stenosis on the opposite side were identified. Primary patency rates were found to be 99% at one year, 95.4% at three years, 90% at five years, 71% at seven years, and 71% at nine years. Age was the only independent risk factor affecting survival. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that this technique can be used safely in patients with appropriate internal carotid artery diameter with favorable mid- and long-term patency rates.

Indexed as

Carotid endarterectomypatch closureprimary closure.

Identifiers

PMID40575058
PMCPMC12188973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.