ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2025
Artificial intelligence to predict biomarkers for new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and biomarker-driven prediction of post-coronary artery bypass grafting atrial fibrillation: Integrating clinical, genomic, and metabolic insights.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Review
- Response to Letter to the Editor: Machine-learning model for postoperative atrial fibrillation.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2025Article
- Comment to the article: Machine-learning model for postoperative atrial fibrillation.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to identify predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation in coronary artery bypass grafting patients using routinely collected preoperative tests. Methods: Between January 2020 and December 2023, a total of 50 patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF group; 39 males, 11 females; mean age: 65.9±8.3 years; range, 38 to 77 years) and 50 without postoperative atrial fibrillation (non-POAF group; 41 males, 9 females; mean age: 61.8±10.0 years; range, 41 to 81 years) were randomly selected from a group of patients undergoing two or three-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting. We analyzed preoperative laboratory, demographic and intraoperative data using machine learning models. Results: The overall incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was 21.69%. The three most effective biomarkers were magnesium, total iron binding capacity, and albumin, respectively. A total of 2.0 mg/dL value of magnesium was identified as a threshold value. Magnesium values below 2.0 mg/dL were considered atrial fibrillation-positive, accounting for 25% of the dataset. Total iron binding capacity values higher than 442 µg/dL were considered atrial fibrillation-positive, accounting for 12% of the dataset. The threshold value for albumin was 29 g/dL, and patients with values under this value were considered atrial fibrillation-positive, accounting for 4% of the dataset. Conclusion: Machine learning models demonstrate encouraging results in identifying risk factors for many entities. It is of utmost importance to establish a ranking among risk factors and determine threshold values to support clinicians in decision making. This is our first experience with machine learning in this patient group after cardiac surgery. Further studies are warranted to confirm these data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.