Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40575018›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2025

"I Wish I Knew": Assessing Older Adults' Perceived and Actual Knowledge of Their Partners' End-of-Life Preferences.

Clément Meier, Maud Wieczorek, Carmen Borrat-Besson, Ralf J Jox, Jürgen Maurer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clément MeierFaculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3273-7993
Maud WieczorekFaculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Carmen Borrat-BessonSwiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences (FORS), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8088-2810
Ralf J JoxPalliative and Supportive Care Service, Chair in Geriatric Palliative Care, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jürgen MaurerFaculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Despite the importance of surrogate decision-making by partners at the end of life, there is only limited research on older adults' knowledge of their partners' end-of-life preferences. Hence, this study investigates older adults' perceived and actual knowledge of their partners' preferences for end-of-life care and medical treatments. Research Design and Methods: We analyzed data from 667 respondents aged 50+ from Wave 8 (2019/2020) of the Survey on Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe in Switzerland. We assessed respondents' actual knowledge by comparing their perceptions of their partners' preferences for end-of-life care and medical treatments with the partners' self-reported preferences. Additionally, respondents were asked to rate their perceived knowledge of their partners' wishes. Associations were assessed using multivariable regression models, adjusting for social, health, and regional characteristics. Results: Respondents' actual knowledge of their partners' preferences varied, with the share of correct answers ranging from 35% to 81% depending on the preferences. More than 80% of respondents felt that they knew their partners' end-of-life and medical treatment preferences "rather" or "very" well, and those respondents were more likely to identify their partners' preferences accurately. Discussion and Implications: Improved communication between partners regarding their end-of-life preferences could significantly enhance surrogate end-of-life decision-making. However, since older adults' perceived knowledge of their partners' preferences seems overly optimistic, they may see little need to initiate such conversations by themselves, emphasizing the need for external educational interventions such as role-plays or case study discussions through, say, the community, or healthcare system to encourage such conversations.

Indexed as

CouplesMedical treatmentPartners’ wishesSurrogates

Identifiers

PMID40575018
PMCPMC12199151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.