ArticleF1000Research2025
Exploring the challenges of AI-driven business intelligence systems in the Malaysian insurance industry.
Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) with Business Intelligence (BI) systems in the insurance industry holds the potential for enhanced operational efficiency, strategic decision-making, and improved customer experiences. However, the Malaysian insurance sector faces numerous challenges in realizing this potential, including organizational resistance, skill shortages, regulatory complexities, and financial constraints. This study explores the specific challenges encountered in the adoption of AI-driven BI systems within the Malaysian insurance industry. Methods: Using an integrated framework that combines the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) model and Resource-Based View (RBV), this research examines the internal and external factors that impact AI adoption. A qualitative case study approach was employed, involving in-depth interviews with technical experts, middle management, and senior leaders from key industry players. Thematic analysis of the data identified significant barriers to AI adoption, such as organizational resistance, lack of skilled personnel, and the complexities of navigating regulatory frameworks. Results: The findings provide a deep understanding of the key challenges faced by Malaysian insurers and highlight areas that require attention, such as leadership commitment, workforce upskilling, technological infrastructure improvements, and policy advocacy. Conclusion: This study adds to the limited academic literature on AI-driven BI adoption in emerging markets and offers practical insights to insurers for overcoming these challenges. By addressing these obstacles, this research contributes to the broader discourse on digital transformation in the insurance sector, offering valuable recommendations for overcoming hurdles in AI adoption while maintaining compliance and ensuring customer-centric approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.