ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Luscan-Lumish syndrome: A case report.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLuscan-Lumish syndrome (LLS) is a rare genetic congenital anomaly syndrome characterised by neurodevelopmental disorders, including delayed psychomotor development, behavioral difficulties, relative or true macrocephaly and, in individual cases, ocular abnormalities. This paper aims to present the case of a child with ocular abnormalities associated with LLS. CASE SUMMARY: A 10-year-old girl born at 40 weeks gestation with features of dysmorphia, neurodevelopmental disorders, genetically confirmed LLS, convergent strabismus and suspected congenital glaucoma. Eye examination, ultrasound, optical coherence tomography (OCT), perimetry and electrophysiological study [pattern visually evoked potentials (VEP)] were performed. Best-corrected distance visual acuity was 0.5 in the right eye (correction -1.0 Dsph, -1.0 Dcyl, axis 180°) and 0.62 in the left eye (correction -2.0 Dsph). Near visual acuity (Snellen Chart) with the above correction was -0.5 D. A cycloplegic refraction test yielded -1.25 Dsph, -1.25 Dcyl, axis 165° in the right eye, and -2.0 Dsph, -0.25 Dcyl, axis 154° in the left eye. Intraocular pressure was 15 mmHg in both eyes. OCT of the maculae showed no abnormalities. In both eyes, the average ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer thickness was 73 μm. OCT of the optic nerve disc showed an average retinal nerve fibre layer thickness of 89 μm in the right eye and 81 μm in the left eye, with symmetry of 90%. The rim area was 1.59 mm
conclusionAlthough eye abnormalities are infrequently described in children with LLS, the patients should undergo eye examinations, especially as they may have central nervous system anomalies that may give rise to visual impairments. Generally, children with genetically determined congenital syndromes should receive regular ophthalmic check-ups for a thorough evaluation of the eyes and prognosis of the development of visual function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.