ArticleJournal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO2025
Development and Usability of an Adjustable Prosthesis for Aquatic Therapy.
Article in Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: During aquatic therapy, without a prosthesis, individuals with lower-limb difference are limited in navigating stairs or ladders, performing gait training, balance, and strengthening exercises. A noncustom prosthesis for individuals with transtibial limb difference in aquatic therapy, consisting of interchangeable sockets and pylons, does not exist. Dilatancy has not been applied within a socket to provide an accommodative shape for multiple users. Objectives: This study explores the development and usability of an adjustable prosthesis, utilizing dilatancy, for aquatic therapy. Study Design: The design of this study is developmental. Methods: Participants underwent an informed written consent process (IRB STU00219525). Three individuals (1 male, 55 years; and 2 female, 47 and 22 years) with unilateral transtibial amputations were recruited. A set of interchangeable adjustable sockets and pylons were developed. Utilizing dilatant properties, small particles under vacuum were assessed for their ability to provide a rigid, lightweight, and remoldable pouch within the socket. Participants trialed the prosthesis during two fittings and three aquatic therapy sessions. Upon completion, participants and treating therapists completed the System Usability Scale. Survey results were converted to a 100-point scale. Time to don the prosthesis was recorded, and socket comfort scores at the final session were averaged. Results: The System Usability Scale indicated that the prosthesis was usable for aquatic therapy. Participant scores were 97.5, 95, and 87.5, and therapist's scores were 92.5 and 85 of a total possible 100. Average socket comfort scores were 10, 9, and 7.6/10. Times to don the prosthesis were 5:45, 5:32, and 4:10 (minutes:seconds). Conclusions: This system functioned successfully as a noncustom prosthesis for multiple users in aquatic therapy from the participant and therapists' perspective. Clinical Relevance: The novelty of this system is utilizing a prosthesis for multiple users, improving the rehabilitation capabilities during aquatic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.