Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574788›Full record

SynthesisF1000Research2024

Impact on postoperative complications of combined prehabilitation targeting co-existing smoking, malnutrition, obesity, alcohol drinking, and physical inactivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Line N Lydom, Sofie Anne-Marie S Jensen, Susanne V Lauridsen, Mette Rasmussen, Robin Christensen, Ulla N Joensen, Jacob Rosenberg, Hanne Tønnesen

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in F1000Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Line N Lydom *The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9431-9984
Sofie Anne-Marie S Jensen *The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Susanne V LauridsenThe Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Mette RasmussenThe Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-1544
Robin ChristensenThe Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Ulla N JoensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Jacob RosenbergCentre for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-1086
Hanne TønnesenThe Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7161-3416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the effect on postoperative complications of combined prehabilitation targeting predefined co-existing risky SNAP factors with usual preoperative routines in surgical patients. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guideline and the protocol (CRD42022282611). Five databases were searched from inception to November 7, 2022 for randomised controlled trials on prehabilitation targeting ≥2 predefined risky lifestyles compared with usual preoperative routines. Risky lifestyles included Smoking, Nutrition (malnutrition and/or BMI>25), risky Alcohol intake, and Physical inactivity (SNAP). Primary outcome was postoperative complications ≤30 days. Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool 2 was used and meta-analyses were conducted. GRADE was used to assess certainty of evidence. Results: The search resulted in 20,862 records. At full-text screening, only two (120 participants) of 24 identified trials on combined SNAP intervention had ≥2 predefined risk factors and were included. One (n=110) on intensive physical and brief nutritional intervention to frail patients with colorectal cancer resection reported complication rates of 45% in both groups (relative risk (RR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.51). The other study (n=10, subgroup) on intensive alcohol and smoking intervention in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy, reported complications in 3/7 vs 3/3 participants. The meta-analysis estimated a RR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.51, I Conclusion: Two small of the 24 trials on prehabilitation targeted co-existing and predefined risky SNAP factors and the effect on postoperative complications is very uncertain. Future prehabilitation research involving patient needs is warranted.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingMalnutritionObesityPostoperative ComplicationsSedentary BehaviorSmokingHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsLifestylePostoperative complicationsPrehabilitationSurgery

Identifiers

PMID40574788
PMCPMC12198731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.