Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574737›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medicine open2025

Enhancing Resident Note Documentation: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Accurately Capture Patient Complexity.

De-Vaughn Williams, Scott Keller, Jennifer Mcentee, Escher Howard-Williams, Cristin M Colford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Documenting Clinical Complexity: A Model for Improving Documentation and Billing in Transplant Infectious Diseases.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

De-Vaughn WilliamsUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Scott KellerUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jennifer McenteeUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Escher Howard-WilliamsUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Cristin M ColfordUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Provider notes serve as a critical component of physician workflow, documenting essential aspects of patient care while also fulfilling regulatory and billing requirements. With increasing documentation complexity introduced by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the 2021 mandate for open access to clinical notes, physicians in training must develop skills to accurately document patient complexity. This quality improvement initiative aimed to enhance inpatient note documentation by internal medicine residents, focusing on improving the capture of medical complexity in coding and billing standards. Our intervention included the development and implementation of a standardized progress note template, a structured scoring rubric, multidisciplinary rounds and curriculum integrating faculty and peer-led feedback. The study measured documentation improvements through rubric scores, Length of Stay Index (LOSi), and complications or comorbidities (CC) and major complications or comorbidities (MCC) capture rates. Results demonstrated improvements in LOSi and enhanced CC/MCC capture, leading to improved institutional performance metrics. This initiative highlights the necessity of integrating formal note-writing training within residency curricula to meet evolving documentation demands.

Indexed as

Clinical documentationMedical educationQuality metrics

Identifiers

PMID40574737
PMCPMC12197967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.