Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574672›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2026

Common Neural Deficits in Social and Monetary Reinforcement Learning in Schizophrenia.

Jay Nierenberg, Jaisal T Merchant, Matthew J Hoptman, Deanna M Barch, Erin K Moran, Julia A Ermel, Pamela D Butler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jay NierenbergNathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4643-1020
Jaisal T MerchantDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.
Matthew J HoptmanNathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4485-6102
Deanna M BarchDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1693-8506
Erin K MoranDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7813-8099
Julia A ErmelNathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, United States.
Pamela D ButlerNathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, United States.

Funding

Social Reward Learning in SchizophreniaR21MH116422 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI KAHN, PAMELA BUTLER · 2018 to 2019
$445k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH116422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisIndividuals with schizophrenia (SZ) have well-documented behavioral and neural deficits to reinforcement learning (RL) from monetary feedback. Although they have a range of social functioning deficits, limited research has examined neural processes related to learning from social feedback. The present study examined how neural activation to social RL in SZ compares to activation to monetary RL. STUDY

designThirty participants with SZ and 31 healthy controls completed a Probabilistic RL paradigm that included both social and monetary RL tasks in the scanner, each with positively and negatively valenced trials. Analyses included a region of interest-based approach to examine activation in areas associated with reward, learning, and social processes and assessed neural activation when making task choices (Choice) and upon feedback receipt (Outcome) for social versus monetary RL. STUDY

resultsResults indicated that across tasks, SZ had reduced signal in regions such as caudate and orbitofrontal cortex during Choice but not Outcome. In addition, patterns of neural activation were similar during social and monetary RL, for both valences, and brain activation during RL was largely unrelated to behavioral RL performance in either group.

conclusionsOverall, the findings indicate that although SZ appear to have intact brain activation when receiving feedback about their choices, they may struggle to recruit the necessary circuitry in regions associated with generating expected values to successfully modulate their choices based on the received feedback. This aligns with literature on monetary RL in SZ and suggests that activation patterns may be similar during social RL.

Indexed as

Caudate NucleusChoice BehaviorFeedback, PsychologicalPrefrontal CortexReinforcement, PsychologyRewardSchizophreniaAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedReinforcement Machine LearningfMRIorbitofrontal cortexreward learningsocial cognitionstriatum

Identifiers

PMID40574672
PMCPMC13391679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.