ReviewPathologica2025
Clinical needs and pathology's answers in neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung.
Review in Pathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Tier Prognostic Stratification of Lung Carcinoids (NET G1-G2-G3) by Multivariable, Data-Driven Integration of Ki-67 and Mitotic Count.Endocrine pathology · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of molecular profiling in rare lung neuroendocrine neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) make up a variegated ensemble of malignancies encompassing typical carcinoid (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC). These are low to intermediate grade neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), which are full-fledged high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) showing similar clinical outcomes. Through a peer interaction between oncologist and pathologist, we herein constructed a practical approach based on questioning and answering regarding 8 practical issues aimed to provide shared solutions for clinical decision-making. These issues were itemized as sequential steps guided by clinical reasoning and concerned differential diagnosis, combined subtypes, primary and metastatic tumors, small diagnostic material, predictive biomarkers, tumor staging and, lastly, standardizing terminology. This study takes advantage of the close interaction between oncologists and pathologists as a tool to better delineate the decision-making on lung NENs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.