ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Capturing the Electrical Activity of all Cortical Neurons: Are Solutions Within Reach?
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal inter-electrode distances for maximizing single unit yield per electrode in neural recordings.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Capturing the Electrical Activity of all Cortical Neurons: Are Solutions Within Reach?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in high-density implantable intracortical electrode technology have significantly improved neural interfaces for both research and clinical applications. However, a significant challenge persists: scaling up these devices to achieve recording of nearly all single-unit activity across large brain volumes. This critical review explores recent progress in neural electrode design, focusing on the challenges of achieving scalable solutions for this ambitious goal. The physical and technical constraints of both rigid and flexible probes are addressed, highlighting the limitations imposed by shank stiffness, mechanical tissue damage, and foreign body response. It is identified that the physics of inserting the electrodes into the brain tissue poses a fundamental constraint, which inherently restricts achievable electrode density. Biohybrid strategies, integrating biological and synthetic components, have shown promise, but they have yet to overcome the major challenges necessary to achieve a scalable functional interface. It is concluded that, given the current limitations of available techniques, there is a pressing need to explore fundamentally novel approaches to realize the vision of recording the electrical activity of every cortical neuron within the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.