Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574626›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Capturing the Electrical Activity of all Cortical Neurons: Are Solutions Within Reach?

Attila Kaszás, Domokos Meszéna, Richárd Fiáth, Andrea Slézia, István Ulbert, Gergely Katona

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Capturing the Electrical Activity of all Cortical Neurons: Are Solutions Within Reach?Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Attila KaszásInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-3722
Domokos MeszénaInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4042-2542
Richárd FiáthInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8732-2691
Andrea SléziaInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-3169
István UlbertInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-9159
Gergely KatonaInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, 1117, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-0355

Funding

Bolyai János Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesERA-NET 2019-2.1.7-ERA-NET-2021-00023Hungarian Brain Research Program NAP2022-I-2/2022Hungarian Research Network HUN-REN-HAZAHIVO-2023Hungarian Research Network KSZF-174/2023National Research, Development and Innovation Office 150574National Research, Development and Innovation Office PD143582Pharmaceutical Research and Development Laboratory Project RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00015Thematic Programme of Excellence TKP2021-EGA-42
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in high-density implantable intracortical electrode technology have significantly improved neural interfaces for both research and clinical applications. However, a significant challenge persists: scaling up these devices to achieve recording of nearly all single-unit activity across large brain volumes. This critical review explores recent progress in neural electrode design, focusing on the challenges of achieving scalable solutions for this ambitious goal. The physical and technical constraints of both rigid and flexible probes are addressed, highlighting the limitations imposed by shank stiffness, mechanical tissue damage, and foreign body response. It is identified that the physics of inserting the electrodes into the brain tissue poses a fundamental constraint, which inherently restricts achievable electrode density. Biohybrid strategies, integrating biological and synthetic components, have shown promise, but they have yet to overcome the major challenges necessary to achieve a scalable functional interface. It is concluded that, given the current limitations of available techniques, there is a pressing need to explore fundamentally novel approaches to realize the vision of recording the electrical activity of every cortical neuron within the brain.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexElectrodes, ImplantedNeuronsAnimalsHumansbrain‐computer interfaceforeign body responsehigh‐density recordingintracortical electrodeneural interface

Identifiers

PMID40574626
PMCPMC12407269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.