ArticleESC heart failure2025
Improvements in medical therapy and prognosis for patients with HFrEF following the 2021 ESC HF guidelines.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients with HFrEF Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis, Evidence of Cardiac Reverse Remodeling During 12-Month Follow-Up: Case Series.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Digital heart failure management: Insights from the COPILOT study.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Bridging heart failure clinic-based guideline-directed medical therapy optimization and real-world practice in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Improvements in medical therapy and prognosis for patients with HFrEF following the 2021 ESC HF guidelines.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Nurse-Led, Remote Optimisation of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Across Australia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) sequencing strategy for patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) underwent a paradigm shift with the 2021 ESC HF guidelines, from stepwise escalation to rapid simultaneous initiation of quadruple therapy. We aimed to assess the temporal trends in the use of GDMT and prognosis for patients with HFrEF. METHODS AND
resultsThrough the Norwegian HF Registry, we obtained data on patients treated at HF outpatient clinics with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% from 2016 through 2023 (n = 13 992), including GDMT, HF hospitalisations and mortality. Since 2016, >90% of patients have been treated with beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin-system-inhibitors, with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) utilisation increasing from 4% in 2016 to 54% in 2023. Mineralocorticoid-receptor-antagonists (MRA) utilisation was at 36% in 2016, increased by 3% per year to 54% in 2021, and thereafter increased by 12% per year to 78% in 2023. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2-inhibitors (SGLT2i) utilisation increased rapidly from 3% in 2020 to 85% in 2023. The utilisation of ≥50% of target dose followed similar trends. From 2016 to 2021, the crude 6-month mortality rate remained at 2.7%, followed by a decline of approximately 0.5% per year to 1.8% in 2023. HF hospitalisations declined steadily from 12.9% in 2016 to 8.2% in 2021, with a further decline to 6.8% in 2023.
conclusionsThe utilisation of GDMT in Norwegian HF clinics has increased markedly since 2016, with a fourfold acceleration in MRA and a substantial increase in SGLT2i use following the 2021 ESC HF guidelines. HF hospitalisations have consistently declined, while mortality rates first declined after 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.