ArticleBJPsych open2025
Dealing with the directive to restrict access to lethal means: parents' perspectives.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parents' stress and distress in the face of their children's self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: a scoping review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- What parents tell us about the complex reality of lethal means restriction.BJPsych open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYouth suicidal ideation and behaviour are major significant concerns, with suicide being the third leading cause of death among youth. In recent years, the trend toward deinstitutionalisation has caused parents of high-risk youth to face increasing emotional and practical challenges, including managing lethal means restriction (LMR) to reduce suicide risk.
aimsThis qualitative study explores the experiences of parents instructed by mental health professionals to restrict their child's access to lethal means in managing suicidal behaviours.
methodTwelve Israeli parents of youth aged 12-21 years participated in in-depth interviews. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis, the study investigated the emotional, psychological and relational challenges parents face when implementing LMR.
resultsFindings indicate that parents struggle to understand and implement LMR guidance, experience emotional strain from their role as protectors, and face pervasive anxiety about their child's safety. The study also highlights feelings of helplessness and the erosion of trust between parents and children. Many parents criticise LMR, viewing it as potentially harmful to their relationship with their child or ineffective at keeping their child safe.
conclusionsThis study underscores the emotional and practical challenges parents face when implementing LMR. To improve its effectiveness, guidance should be re-evaluated and communicated more flexibly, emphasising shared responsibility between the parent and child, and address the emotional toll on parents during this critical period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.