ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025
Changes in multi-gene cancer panels for children: A 4-year retrospective review.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changes in multi-gene cancer panels for children: A 4-year retrospective review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The multi-gene panel is the most utilized genetic test to evaluate for germline cancer predisposition syndromes. However, the rate of change of commercial multigene panels is not well understood, and its value as a standalone test has also not been investigated. We conducted a retrospective chart review of the UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Cancer Predisposition Program's genetic testing results to evaluate how multigene panels for pediatric and young adult patients with cancer have changed in size and scope from 2018 to 2022. We find that multigene panels show a trend of growing larger in number of genes included over time and explore the utility of additional genetic testing after the initial round of multi-gene panel testing. We demonstrate heterogeneity between commercial genetic testing laboratories and their panels over time, signifying a need for equity among genetic testing panels and vigilance among physicians and genetic counselors ordering panel-based testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.