ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
A Qualitative Study Exploring Nursing Scope of Practice for the Care of People Experiencing Homelessness.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences and challenges of North Korean defectors with cervical cancer: a qualitative study using thematic analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- 'Hard-to-Reach' or 'Hardly Reached'? Underservice, Marginalisation and Inequity in Care.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore the key knowledge, skills, attributes and organisational support that nurses require to optimise their scope of practice when providing care to people experiencing homelessness.
designA qualitative descriptive study exploring nurses' scope of practice for addressing health needs of people experiencing homelessness.
methodsInterviews and focus groups were conducted from 2022 to 2024 with 42 people with lived experience of homelessness across two Australian cities. Thematic analysis identified essential skills, attributes and approaches to improve access to care and eliminate stigma. Findings were then presented in focus groups with 11 registered nurses in specialist homeless health services to elicit views on optimising scope of practice. The study follows COREQ reporting guidelines for qualitative research.
resultsLived-experience participants-ranging from 18 to 84 years, a third living in cars or tents-identified key nursing attributes and practices, including approachability, compassion, non-judgement, flexibility, community embeddedness, trauma-informed and culturally safe practice, plus skills in physical and mental health assessment, medication management and service navigation. Nurse participants agreed with lived-experience participants, and highlighted organisational support needs, including information sharing, clinical supervision, assertive outreach, nurse prescribing and long-term funding for nurse-led programs.
conclusionWith rising housing instability, preparing nurses to optimise access to care for people experiencing homelessness is critical. Optimal scope of practice includes personal attributes to build rapport and reduce stigma alongside clinical skills. Co-developing educational programs in partnership with people with lived experience of homelessness and homeless health nurses offers a promising approach. IMPACT: This research informs the scope of practice definitions and the future development of a co-developed nursing education pathway and organisational framework to improve access to care for people experiencing homelessness in Australia. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Limited patient and public involvement was incorporated and focused on providing feedback on interview guides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.