Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574390›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025

Optimised Convolution Layers of DnCNN using Vedic Multiplier and Hyperparameter Tuning in Cancer Detection on Field Programmable Gate Array

S Roobini Priya, Prema Vanaja Ranjan, Shanker Nagalingam Rajediran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S Roobini PriyaDepartment of EEE, CEG Campus Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Prema Vanaja RanjanDepartment of EEE, CEG Campus Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shanker Nagalingam RajediranDepartment of Computer Science, Aalim Muhammad Salegh College of Engineering, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecently, deep learning (DL) algorithms use Arithmetic Units (AU) in CPU/GPU hardware for processing images/data. AU operates in fixed precision and limits the representation of weights and activations in DL. The problem leads to quantization errors, which reduce accuracy during cancer cell segmentation.

methodsIn this study, arithmetic multiplication in convolution layers is replaced with Vedic multiplication in the proposed DnCNN algorithm. Next, Vedic multiplication-based convolution layers in the DnCNN architecture are optimized using POA (Pelican Optimization Algorithm), and the resulting POA-DnCNN is implemented on an FPGA device for breast cancer detection, segmentation, and classification of benign and malignant breast lesions. DISCUSSION: In the convolution layer of DnCNN, floating-point operations are performed through the Hybrid-Vedic (HV) multiplier called 'CUTIN,' which is the combination of

resultsThe proposed HV-FPGA-based breast cancer detection system, employing Vedic multiplication in the convolution layers of DnCNN and hyperparameters optimized by POA, detects stages of breast cancer with an accuracy of 96.3%, precision of 94.54%, specificity of 92.37%, F-score of 93.56%, IoU of 94.78%, and DSC of 95.45%, outperforming existing methods.

conclusionThe proposed CUTIN multiplier uses a CSA (carry save adder) with simplified sum-carry generation logic (CSCGL), achieving lower area-delay, high speed, and improved precision.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMammographyBreast cancer segmentationCNNFPGANikhilam with upasutraUrdhva Tryambakam SutraVedic Multiplication

Identifiers

PMID40574390
PMCPMC13223491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.