Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574354›Full record

GuidelineHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2025

ESHRE good practice recommendations on fertility preservation involving testicular tissue cryopreservation in children receiving gonadotoxic therapies†.

ESHRE FP for Boys Working Group, Rod T Mitchell, Cristina Eguizabal, Ellen Goossens, Michael Grynberg, Kirsi Jahnukainen, Nathalie Le Clef, Callista L Mulder, Nina Neuhaus, Michael P Rimmer and 4 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ESHRE recommendations on Good Practice in the IVF laboratory†.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

ESHRE FP for Boys Working Group
Rod T MitchellRoyal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4650-3765
Cristina EguizabalAdvanced Therapies Unit, Basque Center for Blood Transfusion and Human Tissues, Galdakao, Spain; Cell Therapy, Stem Cells and Tissues, Biobizkaia Health Research Center, Barakaldo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8738-2077
Ellen GoossensResearch Group Genetics, Reproduction and Development (GRAD), Biology of the testis (BITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7601-9689
Michael GrynbergService de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1549-1802
Kirsi JahnukainenNew Children's Hospital, Paediatric Research Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-2028
Nathalie Le ClefEuropean Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), Strombeek-Bever, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4574-1809
Callista L MulderReproductive Biology Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9160-7585
Nina NeuhausCentre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0181-6194
Michael P RimmerCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute of Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-8753
Jan-Bernd StukenborgNORDFERTIL Research Lab Stockholm, Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2839-1870
Marianne D van de WeteringPrinses Máxima Centrum voor kinderoncologie BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ans M M van PeltReproductive Biology Laboratory, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9155-548X
Christine WynsCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6581-5003

Funding

European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionHow should fertility preservation in child and adolescent males receiving gonadotoxic therapies be managed? SUMMARY ANSWER: There were 44 recommendations formulated to provide guidance on all aspects of fertility preservation in prepubertal boys and adolescent males in whom it is not possible to obtain sperm by established methods including semen cryopreservation and surgical sperm extraction; the recommendations covered topics from setting up a fertility preservation program, determining who is eligible, and counselling, to the practical aspects of the testicular tissue biopsy and cryopreservation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: For young males facing gonadotoxic treatment, there are limited options for fertility preservation. For those who are unable to produce sperm (children and adolescents) testicular tissue cryopreservation is being increasingly offered prior to gonadotoxic treatment for potential future clinical use to restore fertility. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This Good Practice Recommendations (GPR) article was developed according to a predefined methodology for ESHRE good practice recommendations. Recommendations are supported by data from the literature, if available. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsESHRE appointed a European multidisciplinary working group with expertise in paediatric oncology, paediatric endocrinology, human tissue banking, and surgery, as well as reproductive specialists and researchers, who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in fertility preservation in prepubertal boys and adolescent males. The recommendations were formulated based on the expert opinion of the working group, while taking into consideration the published data. The draft document was then open to ESHRE members for online peer review and was revised in light of the comments received. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The multidisciplinary working group formulated 44 recommendations to provide guidance on all aspects of fertility preservation by testicular tissue cryopreservation, from setting up a fertility preservation program, determining who is eligible and counselling, to the practical aspects of the testicular tissue biopsy and cryopreservation. LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: These guidelines offer valuable direction for healthcare professionals taking care of children and adolescents facing gonadotoxic treatment. Their purpose is to promote knowledge among clinicians and to enable patients to make informed decisions based on realistic expectations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThis article provides not only good practice advice but also highlights the areas that need further research. This research, when well-conducted, will be key to making progress in the area of fertility preservation in children and adolescents. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: All costs relating to the development process, including meetings and technical support for this project, were funded by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). There was no external funding of the development process or manuscript production. RTM was supported by a UKRI Future Leader Fellowship. The other authors disclosed no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A. DISCLAIMER: This Good Practice Recommendations document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation.ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type.Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCryopreservationFertility PreservationInfertility, MaleTestisAdolescentChildHumansMaleAntineoplastic AgentsboyscancerchemotherapyESHREfertility preservationgood practiceguidelinesimmature testicular tissueinfertilityreproductive tissue

Identifiers

PMID40574354
PMCPMC12314154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.