ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Social patterns of miscarriage reporting and risk: insights from survey data in France.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transfer Strategy Minimizing Twin Risk of Double Blastocyst Transfers Based on Prediction Models.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Miscarriages, which are spontaneous pregnancy losses before 20-28 weeks of gestation, affect approximately 15% of recognized pregnancies. Existing population-based evidence of social inequalities in miscarriage risk is inconsistent, partly due to a lack of data. Surveys can be representative of a national population but are subject to underreporting of miscarriages. We examine whether miscarriages are underreported in a French nationally representative survey, FECOND (2010-11), and analyse socioeconomic risk factors for miscarriage. First, we apply a model that estimates miscarriage underreporting. Second, we use multilevel multinomial logistic regressions to examine socio-demographic and epidemiological factors associated with miscarriage. We estimate that 92% of miscarriages were reported, and underreporting was slightly more pronounced among lower-educated women. The estimated prevalence of miscarriages (14% of all pregnancies) is unaffected by underreporting rates and only with small educational differences. Thus, investigating social disparities in miscarriage risk can be done without correcting for reporting bias. Advanced reproductive ages are associated with higher miscarriage risk. Unobserved time-consistent individual characteristics explain the association between miscarriage risk and prior reproductive history. Conversely, education and self-assessed financial conditions are not associated with miscarriage risk. Younger cohorts exhibit a higher miscarriage risk, suggesting an age effect on recall, a cohort effect on pregnancy recognition, or reduced stigma resulting in more reliable reporting of miscarriage. In sum, the miscarriage reporting rate in FECOND survey is relatively high and with only slight social disparities. No large socioeconomic differences were found in miscarriage risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.