Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574309›Full record

ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2025

Understanding plant phenotypes in crop breeding through explainable AI.

Monica F Danilevicz, Shriprabha R Upadhyaya, Jacqueline Batley, Mohammed Bennamoun, Philipp E Bayer, David Edwards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monica F DanileviczSchool of Biological Sciences and Centre for Applied Bioinformatics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Shriprabha R UpadhyayaSchool of Biological Sciences and Centre for Applied Bioinformatics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Jacqueline BatleySchool of Biological Sciences and Centre for Applied Bioinformatics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5391-5824
Mohammed BennamounSchool of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Philipp E BayerSchool of Biological Sciences and Centre for Applied Bioinformatics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8530-3067
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences and Centre for Applied Bioinformatics, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7599-6760

Funding

Australian Research Council DE210100398Australian Research Council DP200100762Australian Research Council DP210100296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning use in plant phenotyping has grown exponentially. These algorithms empowered the use of image data to measure plant traits rapidly and to predict the effect of genetic and environmental conditions on plant phenotype. However, the lack of interpretability in machine learning models has limited their usefulness in gaining insights into the underlying biological processes that drive plant phenotypes. Explainable AI (XAI) emerges to help understand the 'why' behind machine learning model predictions and allow researchers to investigate the most influential features that lead to prediction, classification or segmentation results. Understanding the mechanisms behind model prediction is also central to sanity-checking models, increasing model reliability and identifying dataset biases that may limit the model's applicability across different conditions. This review introduces the concept of XAI and presents current algorithms, emphasizing their suitability for different data types or machine learning algorithms. The use of XAI to leverage trait information is highlighted, showcasing how recent studies employed model explanations to recognize the features that impact plant phenotype. Overall, this review presents a framework for using XAI to gain insights into intricate biological processes driving plant phenotypes, underscoring the significance of transparency and interpretability in machine learning.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCrops, AgriculturalMachine LearningPlant BreedingAlgorithmsPhenotypeclimate resiliencecrop breedingdeep learningexplainable AIUAV images

Identifiers

PMID40574309
PMCPMC12483962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.