ArticleJournal of health organization and management2025
A soft policy instrument with a hard content? An analysis of national agreements in Swedish multi-level healthcare.
Article in Journal of health organization and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn Sweden, a decentralized unitary state, the 21 self-governing regions are responsible for healthcare. A governing tool in the relations between the central government and the regions is the use of "national agreements". The literature describes agreements as soft policy instruments, meaning they are voluntary, non-binding and lack detail. Our purpose is to analyse the content of national agreements in Swedish healthcare to explore their characteristics. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We use document analysis to investigate whether the content of the national agreements in Swedish healthcare is primarily general or specific in terms of stated goals, measures, disbursement and review. The analysis includes eight agreements from 2022.
findingsThe content varies in specificity and detail across agreements in healthcare, some being specific while others are more general and broadly formulated. An important conclusion is that agreements within the same policy area can have different characteristics. Agreements are inherently "soft", but with potential variations in their application and consequences. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Due to their high level of detail and scope, agreements may pose a challenge to the principle of regional self-government. This could limit the regions' discretion to set their own priorities and make necessary adjustments, ultimately impacting both efficiency and accountability within healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.