ArticlePolymers2025
Construction of Isotropy-Enhanced Honeycomb and Its Deformation Behaviors in Multi-Directions.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Honeycomb structures are widely constructed as cores in sandwich panels with lightweight characteristics and excellent out-of-plane properties. However, their in-plane performances are significantly inferior. This research proposed a novel isotropy-enhanced honeycomb (IEH) with interleaved layers, which is constructed by offsetting the initial seed distributions across layers and then generating hexagonal cells via Voronoi tessellation. Numerical models with three layer-to-layer interval gradients were developed for simulations, and corresponding samples were additively manufactured for experimental validations. The in-plane and out-of-plane performances of IEH and the regular hexagonal honeycombs (RHHs) were comprehensively compared and investigated from quasi-static compression, energy absorption, mechanical properties, and dynamic loading. The results demonstrated that the IEH extremely enhances the in-plane properties by around 500% compared to the RHH, including stiffness, strength, plateau stress, and specific energy absorption (SEA). Although the improvements come at the expense of a partial reduction in out-of-plane stiffness, strength, and SEA, the in-plane performances of IEH reach approximately 70% of their out-of-plane performances, greatly improving the structural isotropy. Introducing layer-to-layer interval gradient leads to a slight reduction in out-of-plane mechanical properties while improving the early-stage deceleration under impact. These findings promote the considerable potential of sandwich panels utilizing IEH cores for applications requiring enhanced resistance to multi-directional impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.