ReviewPolymers2025
Risk Assessment of Microplastics in Humans: Distribution, Exposure, and Toxicological Effects.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Micro- and nanoplastics in the human genitourinary system: oncological impact - a systematic review.BJU international · 2026Pooled it
- Microplastics and IgA nephropathy: a novel environmental hypothesis of immune dysregulation.Renal failure · 2026Review
- Review
- Microplastic toxicity: mechanisms, assessment methods, and future research directions.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Tea bags as hidden source of micro- and nanoplastics: a systematic review for food safety.Current research in food science · 2026Review
- The Threat of Micro-/Nanoplastics to Male Fertility: A Review of the Data and the Importance of Future Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Nano- and Microplastics in the Brain: An Emerging Threat to Neural Health.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microplastics are widely present in the environment, and their potential risks to human health have attracted increasing attention. Research on microplastics has exhibited exponential growth since 2014, with a fast-growing focus on human health risks. Keyword co-occurrence networks indicate a research shift from environmental pollution toward human exposure and health effects. Additionally, Trend Factor analysis reveals emerging research topics such as reproductive toxicity, neurotoxicity, and impacts on gut microbiota. This meta-analysis included 125 studies comprising 2977 data samples. The results demonstrated that cytotoxicity in experimental systems was primarily concentrated in Grade I (non-toxic, 62.8%) and Grade II (mildly toxic, 27.6%). Notably, inhibitory effects on cells were significantly enhanced when microplastic concentrations exceeded 40 μg/mL or particle sizes were smaller than 0.02 μm. The Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) model was applied to predict cell viability, achieving an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.