Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574209›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Influence of Different Adhesives and Surface Treatments on Shear and Tensile Bond Strength and Microleakage with Micro-CT of Repaired Bulk-Fill Composites.

Handan Yıldırım-Işık, Mediha Büyükgöze-Dindar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Handan Yıldırım-IşıkDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Beykent University, 34500 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8850-3523
Mediha Büyükgöze-DindarHeath Services Vocational School, Trakya University, 22030 Edirne, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3794-4366

Funding

Istanbul Beykent University 2023-24-BAP-06, 2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repair of defective composite restorations, particularly bulk-fill composites, offers a conservative alternative to complete replacement. However, establishing durable adhesion between aged and fresh composites remains a clinical challenge due to the altered surface properties of aged materials. This in vitro study investigated the effects of different surface treatment protocols (no treatment, diamond bur roughening, and air abrasion) and adhesive systems (G-Premio Bond, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Single Bond 2) on the shear bond strength (µSBS), tensile bond strength (µTBS), and microleakage of repaired bulk-fill composites. Results demonstrated that both surface treatment and adhesive type significantly affected bond strength (

Indexed as

composite repairdental bondingdental leakageshear strengthtensile strength

Identifiers

PMID40574209
PMCPMC12196890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.