ArticlePolymers2025
Effect of 3D Printing Parameters on the Viscoelastic Behavior of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene: Fractional Calculus Modeling and Statistical Optimization.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the challenge of optimizing the viscoelastic performance of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling (FDM), where printing parameters strongly influence mechanical properties. The objective was to systematically evaluate the effects of four key factors-infill pattern, build orientation, layer height, and filament color-on storage modulus, damping factor, and glass transition temperature. A combined experimental design approach was employed: Taguchi's L9 orthogonal array efficiently screened parameter effects, while response surface methodology (RSM) enabled detailed analysis of interaction effects and multiresponse optimization. Results revealed that build orientation and layer height had the greatest impact, increasing instantaneous stiffness (Eu) by up to 81%, equilibrium modulus (E0) by 128%, and glass transition temperature (Tg) by 1.46%, while decreasing the damping factor (tan δ) by 3.4% between optimized and suboptimal conditions. To complement the statistical optimization, the fractional Zener model (FZM) was applied to characterize the viscoelastic response of two representative samples optimized for either high stiffness or high flexibility. The flexible sample exhibited a higher fractional order (α=0.24), indicating enhanced elastic mobility, while the stiff sample showed a higher activation energy (Ea=0.52 eV), consistent with restricted molecular motion. This integrated approach provides a robust and generalizable framework for improving material performance in polymer additive manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.