ArticlePolymers2025
Parametric Study of Geometry and Process Parameter Influences on Additively Manufactured Piezoresistive Sensors Under Cyclic Loading.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The additive manufacturing of piezoresistive sensors offers several advantages, such as the elimination of assembly or installation steps, enabling integration into complex parts precisely where desired, and compatibility with soft robotics applications. Previous studies have demonstrated that several characteristics of additively manufactured sensors, such as their resistance and sensitivity, are significantly affected by the selected printing parameters. This work seeks to further the understanding of the relationships between process parameters, material, sensor design, and the resulting sensor characteristics. To this end, sensors made from two materials, with differing printing layer heights, infill angles, and thicknesses, are characterized under cyclic tensile loading. For these sensors, the nonlinearity, hysteresis, and drift are analyzed. The findings indicate that both nonlinearity and hysteresis are significantly affected by the material choice, as well as the selected parameters. Notably, parameters that affect the sensitivity of the sensor, e.g., the infill angle, can have significant indirect effects on the nonlinearity and hysteresis errors. Through correct parameter selection, nonlinearity errors can be reduced by up to 30.7% or 25.3%, depending on the material used. The hysteresis error can be reduced by up to 38.7% or 23.8%, depending on the material. The drift over multiple cycles is found to be strongly material dependent, but can also be affected by the process parameters, e.g., the infill angle. Understanding the interactions between material, design, process, and the resulting sensor characteristics provides valuable insights for the successful design and additive manufacturing of piezoresistive sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.