Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40574144›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Evaluating the Impact of Environmental Exposure on the Performance of Polyester Sportswear Materials.

Ivana Salopek Čubrić, Antonija Petrov, Goran Čubrić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivana Salopek ČubrićDepartment of Textile Design and Management, Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, Prilaz baruna Filipovića 28 a, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-4295-5190
Antonija PetrovDepartment of Clothing Technology, Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, Prilaz baruna Filipovića 28 a, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-0422-3765
Goran ČubrićDepartment of Clothing Technology, Faculty of Textile Technology, University of Zagreb, Prilaz baruna Filipovića 28 a, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-4132-299X

Funding

Croatian Science Foundation IP-2020-02-5041Ministry of Science, Education and Youth TP/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing popularity of sporting activities has led to an increased demand for sportswear. Consequently, sportswear developers are, therefore, faced with the challenge of meeting the increasing and more demanding expectations of users. In this study, the effects of aging on sportswear materials made from recycled and conventional polyesters are investigated. The properties analyzed include mass per unit area, thickness, porosity, elongation, bending stiffness, abrasion, and wetting and drying behavior. The results showed that aging leads to an increase in fabric thickness, with recycled polyester showing the largest increase of 6.6%, as well as a reduction in porosity. In addition, recycled polyester exhibited the highest stiffness, while conventional polyester, with the lowest mass per unit area, had the lowest stiffness and offered greater flexibility in movement. Non-aged samples had a shorter wetting time, while the aged materials dried faster. As the material ages, its abrasion resistance decreases. However, the recycled polyester material showed better wear resistance after aging compared to standard materials, indicating its potential long-term durability. In summary, the results suggest that aging significantly affects the structure and functional properties of fabrics, which is important for designing durable sportswear that maintains optimal performance over time and use.

Indexed as

abrasionagingbendingcomfortdryingelongationknitted fabricpolyestersportswearwettingyarn

Identifiers

PMID40574144
PMCPMC12196783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.